Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Opposed (1)Neutral (1)
At a glance
- Public comments
- 2
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Mar 3, 2026.
Public comments (2)
NeutralRemy MitchellMar 3, 2026
The Housing Director explained how the developer overpaid: it calculated fees against the 170 units it built instead of the 115-unit minimum, and committed to better reconciliation going forward.
Budget, Finance, and Economic Development Committee (2025-2027) — March 3, 2026 · 18:02 →OpposedTom CrowleyMar 3, 2026
A frequent testifier tore into the Kamalani project: today's tax records show 170 units with no deed restrictions, resales now run up to $836,000, and the $441,650 the county keeps wouldn't build one affordable home. He demanded no affordable housing credits be issued and called Chapter 2.96 a fundamental failure.
Budget, Finance, and Economic Development Committee (2025-2027) — March 3, 2026 · 1:02:12 →