Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Climate action revolving fund→At a glance
- Public comments
- 5
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 16, 2026.
Public comments (6)
Supported the fund on behalf of the Rotary Club Maui group but asked for tighter focus, including resiliency hubs, and concerns about vague 'nature-based' shoreline spending.
Government Relations, Ethics, and Transparency Committee (2025-2027) — June 16, 2026 · 2:01:23 →A former county staffer who helped write CARP said the plan was meant to be funded, not an unfunded mandate, and asked for clarity on fund administration.
Government Relations, Ethics, and Transparency Committee (2025-2027) — June 16, 2026 · 2:05:41 →Simple message: we have a plan, we need permanent funding for it — urged the council to send it to the ballot.
Government Relations, Ethics, and Transparency Committee (2025-2027) — June 16, 2026 · 2:08:37 →Surfrider Foundation's Hawaii regional manager described king tide flooding she documented herself and urged clear guardrails so funds build real resilience, not questionable shoreline fixes.
Government Relations, Ethics, and Transparency Committee (2025-2027) — June 16, 2026 · 2:09:38 →Testifying for the Kihei Community Association, he supported the fund, citing long-sought walkable-bikeable infrastructure, wetlands work, and recycling needs in Kihei.
Government Relations, Ethics, and Transparency Committee (2025-2027) — June 2, 2026 · 27:27 →Speaking for the Terrence James Young Foundation, she fully supported creating the climate revolving fund and using TAT revenue, saying tourists enjoy the islands so tourist tax revenue should help care for them.
Agriculture, Diversification, Environment, & Public Transportation Committee — May 21, 2026 · 1:04:32 →